The Strait of Hormuz shock has pushed biodiesel back into the energy security spotlight - but the divergence is telling. I discussed this in a question from China Daily.
Indonesia is executing, moving from B40 toward B50 with a levy-funded system; Malaysia is expanding from B10 (partial B20) but it is constrained by cost and infrastructure at each step; Thailand is cushioning via subsidies and B20, while Philippines remains at B3, relying on fiscal relief.
Malaysia's Felda talks about B100 use on its sites. Market reality check: high diesel prices do not automatically make biodiesel viable. Voluntary CPO-to-diesel switching has only worked a small minority of the past decade, clustered in crisis spikes - not a stable regime. This is a diesel story, not a vegoil story - margins are squeezed by weak feedstock signals and high input costs, limiting substitution. Vegoil is priced (higher) for food and many have reservations about further boosting fuels against food.
Against this backdrop, the more immediate lever in Malaysia and others with palm oil mills may not be higher biodiesel blends - but unlocking distributed energy. Palm oil mills already generate significant biomass power from waste streams, yet remain locked out of local grids by utility structures and pricing barriers. With rural areas still reliant on expensive diesel and grid expansion costly, enabling embedded biomass generation offers a practical path to resilience.
Biodiesel remains strategically important but structurally constrained. The near-term opportunity is closer to home - use what palm oil already has. Unlocking palm biomass into local grids may deliver more reliable energy security gains than pushing toward higher biofuel blends.
A deep dive into Malaysia’s call for B100
On a news slot for BFM, I discussed how this is strategically appealing but structurally constrained: while it can be produced at ~RM4.5/L and even briefly undercut diesel during oil shock cycles, this advantage is episodic (below 10% of the past decade?) and distorted by refinery-gate vs subsidised pump pricing. Scaling B100 would require diverting ~8–10 million tonnes (40–50%) of Malaysian palm oil, RM5–10bn+ infrastructure, and potentially RM5–20bn+ in subsidies, while current policy (e.g. RM2.15/L diesel in East Malaysia) effectively overrides market competitiveness. Real-world site deployment also remains limited—it appears no/few mining fleets run B100 at scale, with usage usually capped at B20–B50 due to engine, regulatory, and logistics constraints, even in Indonesia where mines are near palm estates. B100 works in short-term arbitrage and pilots, but not as a system-wide fuel solution.
With ongoing energy shocks and rising energy security concerns, it is time to seriously revisit whether palm oil mills in Malaysia should be allowed to export biomass-generated power into local grids These mills already produce significant underutilised energy from waste streams, yet remain largely locked out by utility structures, pricing controls, and interconnection barriers. In a context where rural areas still rely on costly diesel and grid extension is expensive, enabling embedded generation from palm biomass could provide reliable, localised, and lower-cost power. The question is no longer technical—it is policy: whether Malaysia is ready to unlock distributed energy from an existing asset base to strengthen resilience.
Reach us at khorreports@gmail.com for more information!